- Katılım
- 23 Eki 2020
- Mesajlar
- 1,797
Elliott Oscillator v.I Mov((H+L)/2,5,S)-Mov((H+L)/2,34,S) |
|
lub inaczej - tylko zamknięcie : |
|
Elliott Oscillator v.II Mov(C,5,S)-Mov(C,34,S) |
|
albo jeszcze inaczej : |
|
Elliott Oscillator ShortMA:= Input("Wartość krótkiej średniej -",2,15,5); LongMA:= Input("Wartość długiej średniej -",5,100,35); Mov((H+L)/2,ShortMA,S)-Mov((H+L)/2,LongMA,S) |
Elliott Oscillator Interpretation To: "'metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Elliott Oscillator Interpretation From: Mark Peterman <markp@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 16:07:52 -0600 Encoding: 13 TEXT Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 15:07:14 -0700 Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Resent-Message-ID: <"NObe-3.0.EQ1.DMXvq"@mail.equis.com> Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I should include the interpretation of this oscillator. Here it is: The difference between 5period ma & 35period ma plotted as a HISTOGRAM. In wave 3 the prices are tading in a very srong trend, and beacause of this the 5ma moves away from the slower 35ma at a fast rate & causes the oscillator to have a high peak in ~3. In ~5 prices are higher, but lacks the srong trend as in ~3 & therefore a smaller peak in the oscillator. Historical tests have shown that 94% of time the 5/35 oscilator will pull back to zero during ~4 & therefore identifies ~4. Mark | |
| |
Source / From: | |
|
