Tarama Brady Breakout

Brady Breakout

To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Brady Breakout
From: ClaudB@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 19:54:31 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:54:35 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"csQWp3.0.0r5.wyR8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Here's Jeff Brady's Filter for the Brady Breakout Exploration:

When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E)) AND When(Stoch(5,3),<,80)
AND When(Stoch(5,3),>,Ref(Stoch(5,3),-1)
AND When(MACD(),<,1)
AND When(MACD(),>,Mov(MACD(),9,E)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,0)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-10),>,MACD()))))

Regards,

ClaudB

[2446]


To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: brady breakout system:
From: michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 20:32:25 -0400
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 18:37:20 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"zQuM_1.0.K26._aS8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brady Breakout System
col a:
Stoch(5,3)

col b:
Ref(Stoch(5,3), -1)

col c:
MACD()

col d:
Mov(MACD(),9,E)

col e:
Ref(MACD(), -2)

col f:
Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)

filter:
enabled = YES

When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E))AND
When(C,>,Mov(C,200,S)) AND
When(colA,<,80)AND When(colA,>,colB)AND
When(colC,<,1)AND When(colC,>,colD)AND
When(colE,<,colF)AND When(colE,<,0)AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-10),<,colC





When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E)) AND When(Stoch(5,3),<,80) AND
When(Stoch(5,3),>,Ref(Stoch(5,3),-1) AND
When(MACD(),<,1) AND
When(MACD(),>,Mov(MACD(),9,E) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,0) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-10),>,MACD()))))



Which is the better one ??

I find that the first one hardly ever generates a list.

Mike

[2447]

Re: brady breakout system:

To: michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx, metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: brady breakout system:
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:18:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <19970918.203226.13230.0.michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx>
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 09:17:20 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"Jxl-m1.0.LQ7.-Tf8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mike:

You are correct about the 1st filter. On a sample of 160 miscellaneous stocks, all were rejected.

NOTE: this is a very small sample. Most of these 8 stocks were in an uprend.

I would say that the 2nd filter is more useful.

Lionel

[2459] Source / From:
http://purebytes.com/archives/metastock/